Law Enforcement
Archived Posts from this Category
Archived Posts from this Category
Posted by Jamie on 14 Jul 2007 | Tagged as: EMS, Gadgets, Law Enforcement
Years ago I was fortunate enough to attend one of the first CONTOMS tactical medic classes in Bethesda, MD. Everything about the class was amazing and, surprisingly, the stuff that stuck with me the longest was some of the training that seemed most mundane at the time. Since the course, I’ve used skills learned there to treat a broken tooth, manage hydration, and even store pee in a ziploc bag.
You see, in CONTOMS they taught us that the best way to store urine is to put some silica gel (that stuff that comes in packages) in a ziploc bag. When you urinate into the bag, the gel solidifies the urine and you can store it for later disposal. This is invaluable when you’re on a long deployment and can’t just sneak off into the bushes to do your business.
A German company has developed a commercial version of this idea with their new roadbag device. Designed for long car trips (as far as can be gleaned from the Google translation), perfect for long hours spent at a corner post with no bathroom (as nearly every EMT understands) this is exactly what every EMT-T should have come up with during class.
Via Medgaget.
Posted by Jamie on 14 Jul 2007 | Tagged as: Firearms, Law Enforcement, Less Than Lethal, Military

Pretty intimidating, huh? This is the XREP or eXtended Range Electronic Projectile. Fired from a standard 12ga. shotgun, the XREP offers stand-off distance capability. Once the projectile strikes the target it releases a 20 second (GAH!) burst of electricity.
As David Hambling points out, this weapon raises a lot of questions about where it fits within the force continuum, although I’m sure a few departments will whip together a policy and start sending big, fat Homeland Security Grant checks ASAP.
At present, less-lethals are seen as a supplement to lethal weapons. XREP might see the start of less-lethals being used as an alternative. In the example of room clearance — where insurgents, civilians, or friendly troops can be around the next corner — a shotgun round like XREP can mean the difference between firing first and getting shot. And it means that accidental shootings are a matter of apologizing to the victim rather than burying them.
On the civilian front, there is also the question of how dangerous such rounds are. Getting hit by XREP is not like getting hit by Taser darts. Rick Smith, Taser’s CEO says describes it as “delivering blunt impact similar to other impact rounds” – presumably he means the ‘bean bag’ nonlethal rounds fired from shotguns. These will bruise and can break ribs and cause other injuries; when Baton Rouge Police Department introduced them in 2005 for use against violent suspects, their press release said that “The bean bag round is designed to cause injuries in order to save lives.”
He also raises some interesting questions about the eventual transition of this technology into the civilian world. Will we be safer when criminals start using stun bullets loaded into shotguns?
At first XREP and its competitors and imitators will be confined to the police and military. But, like Tasers, they will branch out into the civilian world. Home defense will be a lot safer with non-lethal projectiles. And what about armed robbers? Are we going to do everything to stop them from getting hold of electric bullets…or would it actually be a step forward if they routinely used stun bullets rather than lethal ones? Should sentencing reflect this?
Posted by Jamie on 01 Apr 2007 | Tagged as: Gadgets, Law Enforcement
After the 2004 beating of suspect Stanley Miller by an LAPD officer wielding an 18-inch long flashlight, public outcry led the department to work with vendors to develop a replacement duty light.
A mere three years later we have the 7060 LED flashlight from Pelican. The light, which will be available to all of us non-LAPD types in June, promises two modes (tactical and patrol or, presumably, the ability to flash the light quickly or switch it on for longer periods), two switches (top and on the endcap), long batter life and blinding brightness.
The unprecedented partnership between Pelican and the LAPD kicked off two years of research and development. While the 7060’s features were determined by the specific needs of the LAPD, new technology was developed by Pelican and further improvements were made based on direct input from the Los Angeles Police Protective League. The result is a unique flashlight that is tremendously brighter than previous LAPD-issued lights, allowing officers to better establish if a suspect several feet away has a gun or other weapon in their hand. The LED lamp is extremely durable and never needs replacing — exceeding 10,000 hours of use, unlike conventional lamps, which fail after 30 hours of use. And the 7060’s 90 minutes of continuous battery life - with no loss in intensity compared to current flashlights that dim as the charge depletes - ensures police officers cover their beat armed with a powerful and long-lasting flashlight.
I think this kind of thinking is really valuable and, ultimately, that it leads to better products. We’ve all seen what a 3-D Maglite can do to someone and, well, it’s not pretty. This little beastie of a light, however, looks pretty bad ass.
Posted by Jamie on 15 Aug 2006 | Tagged as: Apparatus, Law Enforcement
The NYPD is finially starting to realize that those wimpy front wheel drive Impala and Malibu RMPs (radio mobile patrols) just don’t cut the mustard when it comes to rolling up at a no-holds-barred old school style po-lice testosterone party. According to AMNY:
Police Commissioner Ray Kelly announced Monday the department would be testing 15 flashy new 2006 Dodge Chargers on regular patrols, giving the NYPD a new top speed of 150 mph. The cars go from 0 to 60 in 6.5 seconds and stop much faster than NYPD’s current fleet of Chevrolet Impalas and Ford Crown Victorias, which max out at 110 mph.
They also get better gas mileage than the Crown Vic.
“We’re looking to diversify,” said Kelly, who suggested the new cars would be ordered by the hundreds to supplement the 3,000 cars and vans that bear the NYPD insignia. The Impalas and Crown Vics will remain in service throughout the city.
The 340 horsepower monsters will pack Hemi V-8s, stability control systems (which can be disabled on the fly for some real tire-smokin’ pedestrian-jeopardizin’ fun!), and something (a dimmer switch?) that disables the interior lights. Starting price: $29,000 bare. Look for some fancy strobe packages to make these really slick. If dressed up right these would make great highway interceptors but the last thing the NYPD needs on surface streets is to go faster.
Via Jalopnik
Posted by Jamie on 14 Aug 2006 | Tagged as: Aviation, Counterterrorism, Homeland Security, Law Enforcement, Research and Development
This is lifted directly from this post over at Homeland Security Watch.
As the British terror plot was unfolding, the Bush administration quietly tried to take away $6 million that was supposed to be spent this year developing new explosives detection technology. Congressional leaders rejected the idea, the latest in a series of Homeland Security Department steps that have left lawmakers and some of the department’s own experts questioning the commitment to create better anti-terror technologies.
The $6 million refers to a recent attempt by DHS to reprogram funds to the Federal Protective Service, which faces a $42 million budget shortfall in the current fiscal year. Later, the story notes:
The department failed to spend $200 million in research and development money from past years, forcing lawmakers to rescind the money this summer.
The phrase “forcing lawmakers to rescind†is a bit facetious. While it’s true that DHS S&T’s performance has been problematic in many respects, nobody forced Congress to rescind this money during the FY 2007 appropriations process. Congress made a deliberate decision to increase funds for state & local grant programs by raiding S&T’s budget last month. As I noted several weeks ago, “The increases in funds for these programs are made by increasing a rescission to DHS’s FY ‘06 science & technology budget and cutting the DHS management budget respectively - both questionable judgments, in my opinion.â€
Later, the article refers to a technology deployed at Narita Airport in Japan to detect liquid explosives:
The administration also was slow to start testing a new liquid explosives detector that the Japanese government provided to the United States earlier this year.
The British plot to blow up as many as 10 American airlines on trans-Atlantic flights would have involved liquid explosives.
Hawley said Homeland Security is now going to test the detector in six American airports. “It is very promising technology, and we are extremely interested in it to help us operationally in the next several years,†he said.
Japan has been using the liquid explosive detectors in its Narita International Airport in Tokyo and demonstrated the technology to U.S. officials at a conference in January, the Japanese Embassy in Washington said.
This is likely most promising option available in the near-term, and hopefully TSA will accelerate their efforts to field-test it. And DHS S&T should undertake an immediate, comprehensive review of existing technologies and provide targeted seed funding to companies or research labs that have promising technologies which can remedy the system’s vulnerabilities.